Which rules govern what happens when a passenger doesn’t board their flight with checked-in luggage?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

Which international legal document spells out the procedure that a carrier should follow when a checked passenger is late to board a flight?

I have been refused to board a connecting flight and my baggage was not off-loaded.

share|improve this question

  • 9

    I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
    – jpatokal
    Nov 29 at 12:10

  • Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
    – B.Liu
    Nov 29 at 12:11

  • Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 29 at 20:30

  • 2

    Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
    – David Richerby
    Nov 29 at 20:54

  • Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
    – Nate Eldredge
    Nov 29 at 21:54

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

Which international legal document spells out the procedure that a carrier should follow when a checked passenger is late to board a flight?

I have been refused to board a connecting flight and my baggage was not off-loaded.

share|improve this question

  • 9

    I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
    – jpatokal
    Nov 29 at 12:10

  • Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
    – B.Liu
    Nov 29 at 12:11

  • Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 29 at 20:30

  • 2

    Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
    – David Richerby
    Nov 29 at 20:54

  • Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
    – Nate Eldredge
    Nov 29 at 21:54

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

Which international legal document spells out the procedure that a carrier should follow when a checked passenger is late to board a flight?

I have been refused to board a connecting flight and my baggage was not off-loaded.

share|improve this question

Which international legal document spells out the procedure that a carrier should follow when a checked passenger is late to board a flight?

I have been refused to board a connecting flight and my baggage was not off-loaded.

luggage

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

edited Nov 29 at 21:27

JonathanReez

47.7k37223486

47.7k37223486

asked Nov 29 at 12:01

P. Baz

362

362

  • 9

    I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
    – jpatokal
    Nov 29 at 12:10

  • Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
    – B.Liu
    Nov 29 at 12:11

  • Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 29 at 20:30

  • 2

    Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
    – David Richerby
    Nov 29 at 20:54

  • Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
    – Nate Eldredge
    Nov 29 at 21:54

  • 9

    I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
    – jpatokal
    Nov 29 at 12:10

  • Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
    – B.Liu
    Nov 29 at 12:11

  • Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 29 at 20:30

  • 2

    Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
    – David Richerby
    Nov 29 at 20:54

  • Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
    – Nate Eldredge
    Nov 29 at 21:54

9

9

I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
– jpatokal
Nov 29 at 12:10

I don’t believe such a thing exists: each airline, airport and jurisdiction has their own procedures to follow. If you can narrow those down, perhaps we can work out what should have happened.
– jpatokal
Nov 29 at 12:10

Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
– B.Liu
Nov 29 at 12:11

Possibly related: the most popular answer to travel.stackexchange.com/questions/61949/…
– B.Liu
Nov 29 at 12:11

Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
– MonkeyZeus
Nov 29 at 20:30

Having your luggage transported to the final destination without you is a far smaller headache than trying to off-load your luggage from a plane and delaying everyone else’s schedule.
– MonkeyZeus
Nov 29 at 20:30

2

2

Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 20:54

Why do you think there should be an international legal document?
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 20:54

Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
– Nate Eldredge
Nov 29 at 21:54

Is your concern about the inconvenience of being without your luggage, or cost of getting it back, or the security risk of having unaccompanied baggage on a plane? Each may be affected by different rules (though as mentioned there is unlikely to be a single international rule that applies universally).
– Nate Eldredge
Nov 29 at 21:54

5 Answers
5

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote

There is no such thing as far as I know but it is hard prove a negative. Searching online, which I’m sure you have already done, does not seem to find such document. There is a regulation called Passenger Positive Bombing (PPBM) that which is well described in this answer but surprisingly hard to find the official document online.

These things depend on both country and local policies. I have seen cases when the baggage is off-loaded but not always and much less so in the last 10+ years. This could be because there is greater confidence in screening. A particular country can have more strict requirements which would dictate if the flight is allowed to take off with the baggage still on board.

Generally, and there is no official basis for this, airlines tend to be more forgiving with things when they are out of a passenger’s control than otherwise. If you missed a connection because they were late, your luggage might be there already and they often do not off-load it. If you drop luggage off at baggage drop and don’t show for a flight an hour or so later, there is greater cause for concern, so they are more likely to off-load.

share|improve this answer

  • There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
    – DJClayworth
    Nov 29 at 16:42

  • Good find. Edited.
    – Itai
    Nov 30 at 20:09

  • @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
    – user71659
    Nov 30 at 20:13

up vote
5
down vote

There is no “international legal document” governing such cases. The document that governs what happens when you’re late for a flight is the airline’s Contract of Carriage. These typically require you to be present at the gate and ready to board at least 10 or 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure, though it may be more for international flights. Should you miss the flight, the contract of carriage typically specifies that you are considered a no-show and your ticket is forfeited, including any later flights on the same ticket. Airlines may reaccommodate you without charge as a courtesy, but they’re typically under no obligation to do so. But, again, this would vary based on the CoC.

Positive Passenger Bag Matching (PPBM) laws in some countries may require your bag to be removed if you miss the flight for a reason under your own control, but these laws vary by country. Some countries (such as the USA) have no PPBM requirements, since all checked luggage is screened for explosives before it is allowed to be loaded on any aircraft.

In order to answer why PPBM didn’t apply to your flight, you’d need to ask a new question and include the origin and destination of your missed flight. Mentioning the airline would also be helpful in determining what rights you may or may not have, since every airline has its own contract of carriage.

share|improve this answer

  • 1

    To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
    – user71659
    Nov 29 at 23:06

up vote
3
down vote

Sorry, there is no such thing. And related rules and precedent you may find will heavy favor the airline. Some examples can be found at IATA – Baggage Standards.

Based on the question, you were late so the responsibility is solely on you.

Presumably, the connecting flight was domestic where bag match rules have more exceptions, though airlines will most often pull bags.

share|improve this answer

    up vote
    3
    down vote

    There is no international law. Every country might have its regulations or laws, and they might have strong similarities, but there is no overall organization that could make any international law.

    For understanding your situation, consider why the luggage offloading rule exists: A passenger should not be able to get (potentially dangerous) luggage onto a flight if he is not himself on the flight – this assumes that most terrorists would prefer to survive their attack by not flying on the plane with their bomb.
    If a passenger is not on a flight for reasons clearly out of his control, the offloading can be skipped – it would be quite disruptive for the schedule, and he could not intentionally have produced the situation.

    share|improve this answer

      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      There is definitely an international standard, though it is vague:

      ICAO Annex 17

      4.5.3 Each Contracting State shall ensure that commercial air transport operators do not transport the baggage of persons
      who are not on board the aircraft unless that baggage is identified as unaccompanied and subjected to appropriate screening.

      If this was the United States, 49 USC 44901 says that you either need to scan with approved explosives detection systems OR manual/dog inspection OR offload baggage (PPBM). The former 2 options would be “appropriate screening” as ICAO says.

      The EU is similar:

      EU EC 2320/2002

      5.2.2 Unaccompanied Hold Baggage. All items of unaccompanied baggage, both originating and transfer hold baggage, shall be screened by one of the following methods, before being loaded onto an aircraft:

      (a) EDS; or

      (b) a multi-level PEDS, where at Level 2 the images of all bags are viewed by the operators; or

      (c) conventional x-ray equipment with each bag being viewed from two different angles by the same operator at the same screening point; or

      (d) hand search supplemented by the application of Trace Detection Equipment on open pieces of baggage,

      unless the unaccompanied baggage, which has been previously screened to the standard detailed in this Annex, has been separated due to factors beyond the passenger’s control, and the unaccompanied baggage has been within the care of the air carrier.

      share|improve this answer

      • Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
        – reirab
        Nov 29 at 23:34

      • @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 2:30

      • SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
        – reirab
        Nov 30 at 5:12

      • @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 5:17

      • SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
        – reirab
        Nov 30 at 5:19

      Your Answer

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: “”.split(” “),
      id: “273”
      };
      initTagRenderer(“”.split(” “), “”.split(” “), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using(“externalEditor”, function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using(“snippets”, function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: ‘answer’,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: “”,
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: “Powered by u003ca class=”icon-imgur-white” href=”https://imgur.com/”u003eu003c/au003e”,
      contentPolicyHtml: “User contributions licensed under u003ca href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/”u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href=”https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy”u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e”,
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: “.discard-answer”
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });

      }
      });

      draft saved
      draft discarded

      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin(‘.new-post-login’, ‘https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126462%2fwhich-rules-govern-what-happens-when-a-passenger-doesnt-board-their-flight-with%23new-answer’, ‘question_page’);
      }
      );

      Post as a guest

      Required, but never shown

      5 Answers
      5

      active

      oldest

      votes

      5 Answers
      5

      active

      oldest

      votes

      active

      oldest

      votes

      active

      oldest

      votes

      up vote
      6
      down vote

      There is no such thing as far as I know but it is hard prove a negative. Searching online, which I’m sure you have already done, does not seem to find such document. There is a regulation called Passenger Positive Bombing (PPBM) that which is well described in this answer but surprisingly hard to find the official document online.

      These things depend on both country and local policies. I have seen cases when the baggage is off-loaded but not always and much less so in the last 10+ years. This could be because there is greater confidence in screening. A particular country can have more strict requirements which would dictate if the flight is allowed to take off with the baggage still on board.

      Generally, and there is no official basis for this, airlines tend to be more forgiving with things when they are out of a passenger’s control than otherwise. If you missed a connection because they were late, your luggage might be there already and they often do not off-load it. If you drop luggage off at baggage drop and don’t show for a flight an hour or so later, there is greater cause for concern, so they are more likely to off-load.

      share|improve this answer

      • There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
        – DJClayworth
        Nov 29 at 16:42

      • Good find. Edited.
        – Itai
        Nov 30 at 20:09

      • @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 20:13

      up vote
      6
      down vote

      There is no such thing as far as I know but it is hard prove a negative. Searching online, which I’m sure you have already done, does not seem to find such document. There is a regulation called Passenger Positive Bombing (PPBM) that which is well described in this answer but surprisingly hard to find the official document online.

      These things depend on both country and local policies. I have seen cases when the baggage is off-loaded but not always and much less so in the last 10+ years. This could be because there is greater confidence in screening. A particular country can have more strict requirements which would dictate if the flight is allowed to take off with the baggage still on board.

      Generally, and there is no official basis for this, airlines tend to be more forgiving with things when they are out of a passenger’s control than otherwise. If you missed a connection because they were late, your luggage might be there already and they often do not off-load it. If you drop luggage off at baggage drop and don’t show for a flight an hour or so later, there is greater cause for concern, so they are more likely to off-load.

      share|improve this answer

      • There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
        – DJClayworth
        Nov 29 at 16:42

      • Good find. Edited.
        – Itai
        Nov 30 at 20:09

      • @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 20:13

      up vote
      6
      down vote

      up vote
      6
      down vote

      There is no such thing as far as I know but it is hard prove a negative. Searching online, which I’m sure you have already done, does not seem to find such document. There is a regulation called Passenger Positive Bombing (PPBM) that which is well described in this answer but surprisingly hard to find the official document online.

      These things depend on both country and local policies. I have seen cases when the baggage is off-loaded but not always and much less so in the last 10+ years. This could be because there is greater confidence in screening. A particular country can have more strict requirements which would dictate if the flight is allowed to take off with the baggage still on board.

      Generally, and there is no official basis for this, airlines tend to be more forgiving with things when they are out of a passenger’s control than otherwise. If you missed a connection because they were late, your luggage might be there already and they often do not off-load it. If you drop luggage off at baggage drop and don’t show for a flight an hour or so later, there is greater cause for concern, so they are more likely to off-load.

      share|improve this answer

      There is no such thing as far as I know but it is hard prove a negative. Searching online, which I’m sure you have already done, does not seem to find such document. There is a regulation called Passenger Positive Bombing (PPBM) that which is well described in this answer but surprisingly hard to find the official document online.

      These things depend on both country and local policies. I have seen cases when the baggage is off-loaded but not always and much less so in the last 10+ years. This could be because there is greater confidence in screening. A particular country can have more strict requirements which would dictate if the flight is allowed to take off with the baggage still on board.

      Generally, and there is no official basis for this, airlines tend to be more forgiving with things when they are out of a passenger’s control than otherwise. If you missed a connection because they were late, your luggage might be there already and they often do not off-load it. If you drop luggage off at baggage drop and don’t show for a flight an hour or so later, there is greater cause for concern, so they are more likely to off-load.

      share|improve this answer

      share|improve this answer

      share|improve this answer

      edited Nov 30 at 20:08

      answered Nov 29 at 13:06

      Itai

      28.5k968151

      28.5k968151

      • There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
        – DJClayworth
        Nov 29 at 16:42

      • Good find. Edited.
        – Itai
        Nov 30 at 20:09

      • @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 20:13

      • There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
        – DJClayworth
        Nov 29 at 16:42

      • Good find. Edited.
        – Itai
        Nov 30 at 20:09

      • @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
        – user71659
        Nov 30 at 20:13

      There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
      – DJClayworth
      Nov 29 at 16:42

      There are some rules around baggage offloading. European flights (i.e. those to or from Europe) mandate that bags are offloaded for passengers that don’t board. Because Lockerbie. aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/55805/…
      – DJClayworth
      Nov 29 at 16:42

      Good find. Edited.
      – Itai
      Nov 30 at 20:09

      Good find. Edited.
      – Itai
      Nov 30 at 20:09

      @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
      – user71659
      Nov 30 at 20:13

      @Itai That’s not correct in EU since 2002. See my answer for the actual regulation, which sets out the complete requirements.
      – user71659
      Nov 30 at 20:13

      up vote
      5
      down vote

      There is no “international legal document” governing such cases. The document that governs what happens when you’re late for a flight is the airline’s Contract of Carriage. These typically require you to be present at the gate and ready to board at least 10 or 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure, though it may be more for international flights. Should you miss the flight, the contract of carriage typically specifies that you are considered a no-show and your ticket is forfeited, including any later flights on the same ticket. Airlines may reaccommodate you without charge as a courtesy, but they’re typically under no obligation to do so. But, again, this would vary based on the CoC.

      Positive Passenger Bag Matching (PPBM) laws in some countries may require your bag to be removed if you miss the flight for a reason under your own control, but these laws vary by country. Some countries (such as the USA) have no PPBM requirements, since all checked luggage is screened for explosives before it is allowed to be loaded on any aircraft.

      In order to answer why PPBM didn’t apply to your flight, you’d need to ask a new question and include the origin and destination of your missed flight. Mentioning the airline would also be helpful in determining what rights you may or may not have, since every airline has its own contract of carriage.

      share|improve this answer

      • 1

        To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
        – user71659
        Nov 29 at 23:06

      up vote
      5
      down vote

      There is no “international legal document” governing such cases. The document that governs what happens when you’re late for a flight is the airline’s Contract of Carriage. These typically require you to be present at the gate and ready to board at least 10 or 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure, though it may be more for international flights. Should you miss the flight, the contract of carriage typically specifies that you are considered a no-show and your ticket is forfeited, including any later flights on the same ticket. Airlines may reaccommodate you without charge as a courtesy, but they’re typically under no obligation to do so. But, again, this would vary based on the CoC.

      Positive Passenger Bag Matching (PPBM) laws in some countries may require your bag to be removed if you miss the flight for a reason under your own control, but these laws vary by country. Some countries (such as the USA) have no PPBM requirements, since all checked luggage is screened for explosives before it is allowed to be loaded on any aircraft.

      In order to answer why PPBM didn’t apply to your flight, you’d need to ask a new question and include the origin and destination of your missed flight. Mentioning the airline would also be helpful in determining what rights you may or may not have, since every airline has its own contract of carriage.

      share|improve this answer

      • 1

        To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
        – user71659
        Nov 29 at 23:06

      up vote
      5
      down vote

      up vote
      5
      down vote

      There is no “international legal document” governing such cases. The document that governs what happens when you’re late for a flight is the airline’s Contract of Carriage. These typically require you to be present at the gate and ready to board at least 10 or 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure, though it may be more for international flights. Should you miss the flight, the contract of carriage typically specifies that you are considered a no-show and your ticket is forfeited, including any later flights on the same ticket. Airlines may reaccommodate you without charge as a courtesy, but they’re typically under no obligation to do so. But, again, this would vary based on the CoC.

      Positive Passenger Bag Matching (PPBM) laws in some countries may require your bag to be removed if you miss the flight for a reason under your own control, but these laws vary by country. Some countries (such as the USA) have no PPBM requirements, since all checked luggage is screened for explosives before it is allowed to be loaded on any aircraft.

      In order to answer why PPBM didn’t apply to your flight, you’d need to ask a new question and include the origin and destination of your missed flight. Mentioning the airline would also be helpful in determining what rights you may or may not have, since every airline has its own contract of carriage.

      share|improve this answer

      There is no “international legal document” governing such cases. The document that governs what happens when you’re late for a flight is the airline’s Contract of Carriage. These typically require you to be present at the gate and ready to board at least 10 or 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure, though it may be more for international flights. Should you miss the flight, the contract of carriage typically specifies that you are considered a no-show and your ticket is forfeited, including any later flights on the same ticket. Airlines may reaccommodate you without charge as a courtesy, but they’re typically under no obligation to do so. But, again, this would vary based on the CoC.

      Positive Passenger Bag Matching (PPBM) laws in some countries may require your bag to be removed if you miss the flight for a reason under your own control, but these laws vary by country. Some countries (such as the USA) have no PPBM requirements, since all checked luggage is screened for explosives before it is allowed to be loaded on any aircraft.

      In order to answer why PPBM didn’t apply to your flight, you’d need to ask a new question and include the origin and destination of your missed flight. Mentioning the airline would also be helpful in determining what rights you may or may not have, since every airline has its own contract of carriage.

      share|improve this answer

      share|improve this answer

      share|improve this answer

      answered Nov 29 at 20:24

      reirab

      8,34913274

      8,34913274

      • 1

        To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
        – user71659
        Nov 29 at 23:06

      • 1

        To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
        – user71659
        Nov 29 at 23:06

      1

      1

      To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
      – user71659
      Nov 29 at 23:06

      To be precise the US requires either PPBM or screening with explosives detection systems or manual/dog search. There are commercial advantages to the airlines for avoiding PPBM. 49 USC 44901 refers.
      – user71659
      Nov 29 at 23:06

      up vote
      3
      down vote

      Sorry, there is no such thing. And related rules and precedent you may find will heavy favor the airline. Some examples can be found at IATA – Baggage Standards.

      Based on the question, you were late so the responsibility is solely on you.

      Presumably, the connecting flight was domestic where bag match rules have more exceptions, though airlines will most often pull bags.

      share|improve this answer

        up vote
        3
        down vote

        Sorry, there is no such thing. And related rules and precedent you may find will heavy favor the airline. Some examples can be found at IATA – Baggage Standards.

        Based on the question, you were late so the responsibility is solely on you.

        Presumably, the connecting flight was domestic where bag match rules have more exceptions, though airlines will most often pull bags.

        share|improve this answer

          up vote
          3
          down vote

          up vote
          3
          down vote

          Sorry, there is no such thing. And related rules and precedent you may find will heavy favor the airline. Some examples can be found at IATA – Baggage Standards.

          Based on the question, you were late so the responsibility is solely on you.

          Presumably, the connecting flight was domestic where bag match rules have more exceptions, though airlines will most often pull bags.

          share|improve this answer

          Sorry, there is no such thing. And related rules and precedent you may find will heavy favor the airline. Some examples can be found at IATA – Baggage Standards.

          Based on the question, you were late so the responsibility is solely on you.

          Presumably, the connecting flight was domestic where bag match rules have more exceptions, though airlines will most often pull bags.

          share|improve this answer

          share|improve this answer

          share|improve this answer

          answered Nov 29 at 13:06

          Johns-305

          27.1k5593

          27.1k5593

              up vote
              3
              down vote

              There is no international law. Every country might have its regulations or laws, and they might have strong similarities, but there is no overall organization that could make any international law.

              For understanding your situation, consider why the luggage offloading rule exists: A passenger should not be able to get (potentially dangerous) luggage onto a flight if he is not himself on the flight – this assumes that most terrorists would prefer to survive their attack by not flying on the plane with their bomb.
              If a passenger is not on a flight for reasons clearly out of his control, the offloading can be skipped – it would be quite disruptive for the schedule, and he could not intentionally have produced the situation.

              share|improve this answer

                up vote
                3
                down vote

                There is no international law. Every country might have its regulations or laws, and they might have strong similarities, but there is no overall organization that could make any international law.

                For understanding your situation, consider why the luggage offloading rule exists: A passenger should not be able to get (potentially dangerous) luggage onto a flight if he is not himself on the flight – this assumes that most terrorists would prefer to survive their attack by not flying on the plane with their bomb.
                If a passenger is not on a flight for reasons clearly out of his control, the offloading can be skipped – it would be quite disruptive for the schedule, and he could not intentionally have produced the situation.

                share|improve this answer

                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote

                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote

                  There is no international law. Every country might have its regulations or laws, and they might have strong similarities, but there is no overall organization that could make any international law.

                  For understanding your situation, consider why the luggage offloading rule exists: A passenger should not be able to get (potentially dangerous) luggage onto a flight if he is not himself on the flight – this assumes that most terrorists would prefer to survive their attack by not flying on the plane with their bomb.
                  If a passenger is not on a flight for reasons clearly out of his control, the offloading can be skipped – it would be quite disruptive for the schedule, and he could not intentionally have produced the situation.

                  share|improve this answer

                  There is no international law. Every country might have its regulations or laws, and they might have strong similarities, but there is no overall organization that could make any international law.

                  For understanding your situation, consider why the luggage offloading rule exists: A passenger should not be able to get (potentially dangerous) luggage onto a flight if he is not himself on the flight – this assumes that most terrorists would prefer to survive their attack by not flying on the plane with their bomb.
                  If a passenger is not on a flight for reasons clearly out of his control, the offloading can be skipped – it would be quite disruptive for the schedule, and he could not intentionally have produced the situation.

                  share|improve this answer

                  share|improve this answer

                  share|improve this answer

                  answered Nov 29 at 17:00

                  Aganju

                  18.3k53972

                  18.3k53972

                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote

                      There is definitely an international standard, though it is vague:

                      ICAO Annex 17

                      4.5.3 Each Contracting State shall ensure that commercial air transport operators do not transport the baggage of persons
                      who are not on board the aircraft unless that baggage is identified as unaccompanied and subjected to appropriate screening.

                      If this was the United States, 49 USC 44901 says that you either need to scan with approved explosives detection systems OR manual/dog inspection OR offload baggage (PPBM). The former 2 options would be “appropriate screening” as ICAO says.

                      The EU is similar:

                      EU EC 2320/2002

                      5.2.2 Unaccompanied Hold Baggage. All items of unaccompanied baggage, both originating and transfer hold baggage, shall be screened by one of the following methods, before being loaded onto an aircraft:

                      (a) EDS; or

                      (b) a multi-level PEDS, where at Level 2 the images of all bags are viewed by the operators; or

                      (c) conventional x-ray equipment with each bag being viewed from two different angles by the same operator at the same screening point; or

                      (d) hand search supplemented by the application of Trace Detection Equipment on open pieces of baggage,

                      unless the unaccompanied baggage, which has been previously screened to the standard detailed in this Annex, has been separated due to factors beyond the passenger’s control, and the unaccompanied baggage has been within the care of the air carrier.

                      share|improve this answer

                      • Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                        – reirab
                        Nov 29 at 23:34

                      • @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 2:30

                      • SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:12

                      • @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 5:17

                      • SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:19

                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote

                      There is definitely an international standard, though it is vague:

                      ICAO Annex 17

                      4.5.3 Each Contracting State shall ensure that commercial air transport operators do not transport the baggage of persons
                      who are not on board the aircraft unless that baggage is identified as unaccompanied and subjected to appropriate screening.

                      If this was the United States, 49 USC 44901 says that you either need to scan with approved explosives detection systems OR manual/dog inspection OR offload baggage (PPBM). The former 2 options would be “appropriate screening” as ICAO says.

                      The EU is similar:

                      EU EC 2320/2002

                      5.2.2 Unaccompanied Hold Baggage. All items of unaccompanied baggage, both originating and transfer hold baggage, shall be screened by one of the following methods, before being loaded onto an aircraft:

                      (a) EDS; or

                      (b) a multi-level PEDS, where at Level 2 the images of all bags are viewed by the operators; or

                      (c) conventional x-ray equipment with each bag being viewed from two different angles by the same operator at the same screening point; or

                      (d) hand search supplemented by the application of Trace Detection Equipment on open pieces of baggage,

                      unless the unaccompanied baggage, which has been previously screened to the standard detailed in this Annex, has been separated due to factors beyond the passenger’s control, and the unaccompanied baggage has been within the care of the air carrier.

                      share|improve this answer

                      • Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                        – reirab
                        Nov 29 at 23:34

                      • @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 2:30

                      • SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:12

                      • @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 5:17

                      • SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:19

                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote

                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote

                      There is definitely an international standard, though it is vague:

                      ICAO Annex 17

                      4.5.3 Each Contracting State shall ensure that commercial air transport operators do not transport the baggage of persons
                      who are not on board the aircraft unless that baggage is identified as unaccompanied and subjected to appropriate screening.

                      If this was the United States, 49 USC 44901 says that you either need to scan with approved explosives detection systems OR manual/dog inspection OR offload baggage (PPBM). The former 2 options would be “appropriate screening” as ICAO says.

                      The EU is similar:

                      EU EC 2320/2002

                      5.2.2 Unaccompanied Hold Baggage. All items of unaccompanied baggage, both originating and transfer hold baggage, shall be screened by one of the following methods, before being loaded onto an aircraft:

                      (a) EDS; or

                      (b) a multi-level PEDS, where at Level 2 the images of all bags are viewed by the operators; or

                      (c) conventional x-ray equipment with each bag being viewed from two different angles by the same operator at the same screening point; or

                      (d) hand search supplemented by the application of Trace Detection Equipment on open pieces of baggage,

                      unless the unaccompanied baggage, which has been previously screened to the standard detailed in this Annex, has been separated due to factors beyond the passenger’s control, and the unaccompanied baggage has been within the care of the air carrier.

                      share|improve this answer

                      There is definitely an international standard, though it is vague:

                      ICAO Annex 17

                      4.5.3 Each Contracting State shall ensure that commercial air transport operators do not transport the baggage of persons
                      who are not on board the aircraft unless that baggage is identified as unaccompanied and subjected to appropriate screening.

                      If this was the United States, 49 USC 44901 says that you either need to scan with approved explosives detection systems OR manual/dog inspection OR offload baggage (PPBM). The former 2 options would be “appropriate screening” as ICAO says.

                      The EU is similar:

                      EU EC 2320/2002

                      5.2.2 Unaccompanied Hold Baggage. All items of unaccompanied baggage, both originating and transfer hold baggage, shall be screened by one of the following methods, before being loaded onto an aircraft:

                      (a) EDS; or

                      (b) a multi-level PEDS, where at Level 2 the images of all bags are viewed by the operators; or

                      (c) conventional x-ray equipment with each bag being viewed from two different angles by the same operator at the same screening point; or

                      (d) hand search supplemented by the application of Trace Detection Equipment on open pieces of baggage,

                      unless the unaccompanied baggage, which has been previously screened to the standard detailed in this Annex, has been separated due to factors beyond the passenger’s control, and the unaccompanied baggage has been within the care of the air carrier.

                      share|improve this answer

                      share|improve this answer

                      share|improve this answer

                      edited Nov 29 at 23:31

                      answered Nov 29 at 23:25

                      user71659

                      1,1781716

                      1,1781716

                      • Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                        – reirab
                        Nov 29 at 23:34

                      • @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 2:30

                      • SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:12

                      • @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 5:17

                      • SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:19

                      • Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                        – reirab
                        Nov 29 at 23:34

                      • @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 2:30

                      • SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:12

                      • @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                        – user71659
                        Nov 30 at 5:17

                      • SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                        – reirab
                        Nov 30 at 5:19

                      Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                      – reirab
                      Nov 29 at 23:34

                      Note that ICAO SARPs are not “legal documents.” They’re more suggestions than requirements. They carry no legal force unless some nation’s civil aviation authority’s regulations defers to them.
                      – reirab
                      Nov 29 at 23:34

                      @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                      – user71659
                      Nov 30 at 2:30

                      @reirab Not exactly. A standard is “to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention; in the event of impossibility of compliance, notification to the Council is compulsory under Article 38 of the Convention.” It has the force of any international treaty. This is a standard, note the word “shall”.
                      – user71659
                      Nov 30 at 2:30

                      SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                      – reirab
                      Nov 30 at 5:12

                      SARPs aren’t part of the Chicago Convention and don’t carry force of treaty (or any other legal force, unless incorporated by reference in a nation’s laws and/or regulations.) See the Wiki for ICAO SARPs. “SARPs do not have the same legal binding force as the Convention itself, because Annexes are not international treaties.”
                      – reirab
                      Nov 30 at 5:12

                      @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                      – user71659
                      Nov 30 at 5:17

                      @reirab Incorrect. Read the actual Chicago Convention, article 38. Standards are binding unless a State notifies ICAO, and publishes departures, usually as part of the AIP. This is important for the safety of flight. Regardless, all of the previous answers that there are no international standards for unaccompanied baggage are incorrect, both in and outside the EU.
                      – user71659
                      Nov 30 at 5:17

                      SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                      – reirab
                      Nov 30 at 5:19

                      SARPs are never binding. However, you are correct that countries do publish the differences between their laws/regulations and SARPs. There is no legal consequence for violating ICAO SARPs in any nation unless that nation’s laws or regulations make it so. (Also, you will note that that list of SARPs departures is really long.)
                      – reirab
                      Nov 30 at 5:19

                      draft saved
                      draft discarded

                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!

                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid

                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you’re in danger of being blocked from answering.

                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid

                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

                      draft saved

                      draft discarded

                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin(‘.new-post-login’, ‘https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126462%2fwhich-rules-govern-what-happens-when-a-passenger-doesnt-board-their-flight-with%23new-answer’, ‘question_page’);
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Required, but never shown

                      Related Post

                      Leave a Reply

                      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *